首页> 外文OA文献 >Trends in health sciences library and information science research: an analysis of research publications in the \u3cem\u3eBulletin of the Medical Library Association\u3c/em\u3e and \u3cem\u3eJournal of the Medical Library Association\u3c/em\u3e from 1991 to 2007
【2h】

Trends in health sciences library and information science research: an analysis of research publications in the \u3cem\u3eBulletin of the Medical Library Association\u3c/em\u3e and \u3cem\u3eJournal of the Medical Library Association\u3c/em\u3e from 1991 to 2007

机译:健康科学图书馆和信息科学研究的趋势:1991年医学图书馆协会\ u3c / em \ u3e \ u3c / u3e医学图书馆协会杂志的研究出版物分析\ u3c / em \ u3e到2007年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed trends in research activity as represented in the published research in the leading peer-reviewed professional journal for health sciences librarianship.METHODOLOGY: Research articles were identified from the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association and Journal of the Medical Library Association (1991-2007). Using content analysis and bibliometric techniques, data were collected for each article on the (1) subject, (2) research method, (3) analytical technique used, (4) number of authors, (5) number of citations, (6) first author affiliation, and (7) funding source. The results were compared to a previous study, covering the period 1966 to 1990, to identify changes over time.RESULTS: Of the 930 articles examined, 474 (51%) were identified as research articles. Survey (n = 174, 37.1%) was the most common methodology employed, quantitative descriptive statistics (n = 298, 63.5%) the most used analytical technique, and applied topics (n = 332, 70%) the most common type of subject studied. The majority of first authors were associated with an academic health sciences library (n = 264, 55.7%). Only 27.4% (n = 130) of studies identified a funding source.CONCLUSION: This study\u27s findings demonstrate that progress is being made in health sciences librarianship research. There is, however, room for improvement in terms of research methodologies used, proportion of applied versus theoretical research, and elimination of barriers to conducting research for practicing librarians.
机译:目的:本研究分析了健康科学图书馆学专业领先期刊上发表的研究成果所代表的研究活动趋势。方法:从医学图书馆协会简报和医学图书馆协会期刊( 1991-2007)。使用内容分析和文献计量技术,收集有关(1)主题,(2)研究方法,(3)使用的分析技术,(4)作者数,(5)引用数,(6)的每篇文章的数据。第一作者隶属关系,以及(7)资金来源。将结果与以前的研究(从1966年到1990年)进行比较,以确定随时间的变化。结果:在所研究的930篇文章中,有474篇(51%)被确定为研究文章。调查(n = 174,37.1%)是最常用的方法,定量描述统计(n = 298,63.5%)是最常用的分析技术,应用主题(n = 332,70%)是最常见的主题类型研究。多数第一作者与学术健康科学图书馆有关(n = 264,55.7%)。只有27.4%(n = 130)的研究确定了资金来源。结论:本研究结果表明,健康科学图书馆学研究正在取得进展。但是,在使用的研究方法,应用研究与理论研究的比例以及消除对从事图书馆员实践研究的障碍方面,还有改进的空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号